គេហនិទានុលេខន៍យើងនេះ មានគោលបំណងផ្សព្វផ្សាយ​ បទដ្ឋានគតិយុត្ត​ដល់និស្សិត អ្នកស្រាវជ្រាវទាំងឡាយ​​ ដែល​ត្រូវការ​ជំនួយ​ក្នុងការសិក្សាស្រាវជ្រាវ ។ ជាពិសេ វាជាមធ្យោបាយមួយសម្រាប់នាំ ផ្លូវទៅរកគេហទំព័រ និង ប្លក់ផ្សេងៗ ទាំងឡាយ ដែលទាក់ទងនឹង វិស័យច្បាប់។

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

ប្រទេស​ម្ចាស់ជំនួយ​អំពាវនាវ​វៀតណាម​ឲ្យ​ធ្វើ​កំណែទម្រង់​ប្រព័ន្ធ​ធនាគារ និងសហគ្រាសរដ្ឋ - វៀតណាម - RFI

ប្រទេស​ម្ចាស់ជំនួយ​អំពាវនាវ​វៀតណាម​ឲ្យ​ធ្វើ​កំណែទម្រង់​ប្រព័ន្ធ​ធនាគារ និងសហគ្រាសរដ្ឋ - វៀតណាម - RFI

លោក​ប៉ែន សុមុនី៖”យុវជន​អាស៊ាន​មាន​កម្រិត​អប់រំ​ខុសគ្នា​ច្រើន” - RFI

លោក​ប៉ែន សុមុនី៖”យុវជន​អាស៊ាន​មាន​កម្រិត​អប់រំ​ខុសគ្នា​ច្រើន” - RFI

បុគ្គលិក​ខ្មែរ​ភាគច្រើន​ធ្វើការ​ដោយ​ខ្វះ​ការ​ទទួល​ខុសត្រូវ​ - RFI

បុគ្គលិក​ខ្មែរ​ភាគច្រើន​ធ្វើការ​ដោយ​ខ្វះ​ការ​ទទួល​ខុសត្រូវ​ - RFI

Thursday, December 13, 2012

វិធីសាស្ត្រ​របស់​ធនាគារ​អភិវឌ្ឍន៍​អាស៊ី​សំរាប់​បង្កើន​មុខ​ជំនាញ​ដល់​ពលរដ្ឋ

វិធីសាស្ត្រ​របស់​ធនាគារ​អភិវឌ្ឍន៍​អាស៊ី​សំរាប់​បង្កើន​មុខ​ជំនាញ​ដល់​ពលរដ្ឋ

របៀប​បង់​ពន្ធដារ ៥​ប្រភេទ

របៀប​បង់​ពន្ធដារ ៥​ប្រភេទ

អ្នក​បង្កើត​ប្លុក​នៅ​អាស៊ី​នឹង​ជួប​ជុំ​គ្នា​នៅ​ដើម​ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា​នា​ខេត្ត​សៀមរាប

អ្នក​បង្កើត​ប្លុក​នៅ​អាស៊ី​នឹង​ជួប​ជុំ​គ្នា​នៅ​ដើម​ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា​នា​ខេត្ត​សៀមរាប

មន្ត្រី៖ វិស័យ​សារព័ត៌មាន​កំពុង​ពេញ​និយម​ប្រៀប​ធៀប​ទៅ​១០​ឆ្នាំ​មុន

មន្ត្រី៖ វិស័យ​សារព័ត៌មាន​កំពុង​ពេញ​និយម​ប្រៀប​ធៀប​ទៅ​១០​ឆ្នាំ​មុន

កិច្ច​ពិភាក្សា​អំពី​ក្រមព្រហ្មទណ្ឌ​ថ្មី

កិច្ច​ពិភាក្សា​អំពី​ក្រមព្រហ្មទណ្ឌ​ថ្មី

អំពី​សិទ្ធិ និង​នីតិវិធី​នៃ​ការ​ធ្វើ​កូដកម្ម​របស់​កម្មករ​និយោជិត - RFI

អំពី​សិទ្ធិ និង​នីតិវិធី​នៃ​ការ​ធ្វើ​កូដកម្ម​របស់​កម្មករ​និយោជិត - RFI

អំពី​សិទ្ធិ និង​នីតិវិធី​នៃ​ការ​ធ្វើ​កូដកម្ម​របស់​កម្មករ​និយោជិត - RFI

អំពី​សិទ្ធិ និង​នីតិវិធី​នៃ​ការ​ធ្វើ​កូដកម្ម​របស់​កម្មករ​និយោជិត - RFI

អំពើ​ពុករលួយ​បង្កប់​នៅក្នុង​ផ្នត់​គំនិត​មនុស្ស​ខ្មែរ - RFI

អំពើ​ពុករលួយ​បង្កប់​នៅក្នុង​ផ្នត់​គំនិត​មនុស្ស​ខ្មែរ - RFI

លក្ខណៈ​ខុសគ្នា​រវាង​បទ​ឃាតកម្ម ឃាតកម្ម​គិតទុក​ជា​មុន និង​មនុស្សឃាត​ដោយ​អចេតនា - RFI

លក្ខណៈ​ខុសគ្នា​រវាង​បទ​ឃាតកម្ម ឃាតកម្ម​គិតទុក​ជា​មុន និង​មនុស្សឃាត​ដោយ​អចេតនា - RFI

ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង ចាត់ចែង និង​បែងចែក​ទ្រព្យសម្បត្តិ​ប្តីប្រពន្ធ - RFI

ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង ចាត់ចែង និង​បែងចែក​ទ្រព្យសម្បត្តិ​ប្តីប្រពន្ធ - RFI

Sunday, November 18, 2012

សហភាព​អឺរ៉ុប និង​អង់គ្លេស​ចុះ​កិច្ច​ព្រមព្រៀង​រក្សា​សន្តិភាព​ជាមួយ​អាស៊ាន - កម្ពុជា-អាស៊ាន - RFI

សហភាព​អឺរ៉ុប និង​អង់គ្លេស​ចុះ​កិច្ច​ព្រមព្រៀង​រក្សា​សន្តិភាព​ជាមួយ​អាស៊ាន - កម្ពុជា-អាស៊ាន - RFI

ហ៊ុន សែន៖​«នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​២០១៥ សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​អាស៊ាន​បូក៦​នឹង​ក្លាយ​ជា​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ធំ​ជាងគេ ក្នុង​ពិភពលោក» - កម្ពុជា - RFI

ហ៊ុន សែន៖​«នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​២០១៥ សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​អាស៊ាន​បូក៦​នឹង​ក្លាយ​ជា​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ធំ​ជាងគេ ក្នុង​ពិភពលោក» - កម្ពុជា - RFI

យុវជន​មួយចំនួន​ស្ម័គ្រចិត្ត​ជួយ​បម្រើ​ការងារ​អាស៊ាន - RFI

យុវជន​មួយចំនួន​ស្ម័គ្រចិត្ត​ជួយ​បម្រើ​ការងារ​អាស៊ាន - RFI

អាមេរិក​ពង្រីក​ទំនាក់ទំនង​ពាណិជ្ជកម្ម​ជាមួយ​អាស៊ាន - កម្ពុជា - RFI

អាមេរិក​ពង្រីក​ទំនាក់ទំនង​ពាណិជ្ជកម្ម​ជាមួយ​អាស៊ាន - កម្ពុជា - RFI

ក្រុមហ៊ុនខ្មែរ​ចំនួន៣​ទទួល​បាន​ពានរង្វាន់​សហគ្រាសឆ្នើម​អាស៊ាន - កម្ពុជា-អាស៊ាន - RFI

ក្រុមហ៊ុនខ្មែរ​ចំនួន៣​ទទួល​បាន​ពានរង្វាន់​សហគ្រាសឆ្នើម​អាស៊ាន - កម្ពុជា-អាស៊ាន - RFI

Saturday, July 14, 2012

ការ​រំលោភ​កិច្ច​សន្យា​និង​ការ​ផ្ដន្ទាទោស

ការ​រំលោភ​កិច្ច​សន្យា​និង​ការ​ផ្ដន្ទាទោស

ការ​បកស្រាយ​ខ្លឹម​សារ​ច្បាប់​ទាក់ទង​នឹង​អំពើ​ឆបោក

ការ​បកស្រាយ​ខ្លឹម​សារ​ច្បាប់​ទាក់ទង​នឹង​អំពើ​ឆបោក

ខ្លឹមសារ​ច្បាប់​​ទាក់ទង​នឹង​ការ​ផ្ដល់​សន្តិសុខ​ការពារ​ក្រុមហ៊ុន

ខ្លឹមសារ​ច្បាប់​​ទាក់ទង​នឹង​ការ​ផ្ដល់​សន្តិសុខ​ការពារ​ក្រុមហ៊ុន

អាជ្ញាយុកាល​នៃ​បណ្ដឹង​អាជ្ញា

អាជ្ញាយុកាល​នៃ​បណ្ដឹង​អាជ្ញា

តើ​អ្នក​កាប់​ជ្រូក​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​ផ្ដាច់​មុខ​ក្នុង​ការ​ទិញ-​លក់​សាច់​ជ្រូក​ទេ?

តើ​អ្នក​កាប់​ជ្រូក​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​ផ្ដាច់​មុខ​ក្នុង​ការ​ទិញ-​លក់​សាច់​ជ្រូក​ទេ?

មាត្រា​ច្បាប់​ទាក់ទង​ការ​អនុវត្ត​កិច្ចសន្យា

មាត្រា​ច្បាប់​ទាក់ទង​ការ​អនុវត្ត​កិច្ចសន្យា

កម្ពុជា-សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក បន្ត​ដោះស្រាយ​បញ្ហា​ប្រាក់​បំណុល

កម្ពុជា-សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក បន្ត​ដោះស្រាយ​បញ្ហា​ប្រាក់​បំណុល

ក្រុមហ៊ុន​មក​ពី ស.រ.អា វិនិយោគ​៣​លាន​ដុល្លារ​សម្រាប់​ថាមពល​អគ្គិសនី

ក្រុមហ៊ុន​មក​ពី ស.រ.អា វិនិយោគ​៣​លាន​ដុល្លារ​សម្រាប់​ថាមពល​អគ្គិសនី

សង្គម​ស៊ីវិល​សាទរ ស.រ.អា បង្កើន​ទំនាក់​ទំនង​យុវជន​វ័យ​ក្មេង​តំបន់​អាស៊ាន

សង្គម​ស៊ីវិល​សាទរ ស.រ.អា បង្កើន​ទំនាក់​ទំនង​យុវជន​វ័យ​ក្មេង​តំបន់​អាស៊ាន

តើផ្សារមូលប័ត្រកម្ពុជាកំពុងដើរទៅមុខឬទៅក្រោយ? - RFI

តើផ្សារមូលប័ត្រកម្ពុជាកំពុងដើរទៅមុខឬទៅក្រោយ? - RFI

តើអ្នកបង្កើត​មុខជំនួញថ្មី​អាច​ទៅ​ខ្ចីលុយ​ពី​ធនាគារ​មករកស៊ី​បាន​ដែរឬទេ? - RFI

តើអ្នកបង្កើត​មុខជំនួញថ្មី​អាច​ទៅ​ខ្ចីលុយ​ពី​ធនាគារ​មករកស៊ី​បាន​ដែរឬទេ? - RFI

លោក ​ពុយ គា​៖"វៀតណាម​និង​ហ្វីលីពីន​បាន​អុកឡុក​អង្គ​ប្រជុំ​ខ្លាំង"​ - RFI

លោក ​ពុយ គា​៖"វៀតណាម​និង​ហ្វីលីពីន​បាន​អុកឡុក​អង្គ​ប្រជុំ​ខ្លាំង"​ - RFI

វិបត្តិ​​នៅអឺរ៉ុប​​ធ្វើឲ្យ​​ប៉ះពាល់​​ដល់​​កំណើន​​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​​អាស៊ី​​ - វិបត្តិសេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ - RFI

វិបត្តិ​​នៅអឺរ៉ុប​​ធ្វើឲ្យ​​ប៉ះពាល់​​ដល់​​កំណើន​​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​​អាស៊ី​​ - វិបត្តិសេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ - RFI

កម្ពុជា​រង​ថ្ម​បាក់​នៃ​ជម្លោះ​ដែល​ហួស​ពី​សមត្ថភាព​​របស់​ខ្លួន​ - RFI

កម្ពុជា​រង​ថ្ម​បាក់​នៃ​ជម្លោះ​ដែល​ហួស​ពី​សមត្ថភាព​​របស់​ខ្លួន​ - RFI

អេស៊ីលីដា​ជោគជ័យ​នៅ​ឡាវ​ខណៈវិស័យ​ធនាគារ​ប្រទេស​នេះ​កំពុង​រីក​ចម្រើន - RFI

អេស៊ីលីដា​ជោគជ័យ​នៅ​ឡាវ​ខណៈវិស័យ​ធនាគារ​ប្រទេស​នេះ​កំពុង​រីក​ចម្រើន - RFI

លោកស្រីមេធាវី គង់ ច័ន្ទរស្មី

លោកស្រីមេធាវី គង់ ច័ន្ទរស្មី

អំពី​សិទ្ធិ និង​នីតិវិធី​នៃ​ការ​ធ្វើ​កូដកម្ម​របស់​កម្មករ​និយោជិត - RFI

អំពី​សិទ្ធិ និង​នីតិវិធី​នៃ​ការ​ធ្វើ​កូដកម្ម​របស់​កម្មករ​និយោជិត - RFI

Monday, June 11, 2012

លិខិតថ្លែងអំណរគុណ និង ឧទ្ទិសមគ្គផល


ខ្ញុំបាទ ជិន វណ្ណារ៉ា និង​ក្រុមគ្រួសារ សូមថ្លែងអំណរគុណយ៉ាង  ជ្រាលជ្រៅ​ចំពោះ បណ្តាលោក លោកស្រី ទាំងឡាយ រួមមាន ថ្នាក់ដឹកនាំ សាស្រ្តាចារ្យ បុគ្គលិក នៃសាកលវិទ្យាល័យភូមិន្ទ  នីតិសាស្ត្រ និង វិទ្យាសាស្រ្តសេដ្ឋកិច្ច ដែលបានចូលបច័្ចយ ចូលរួមរំលែកទុក្ខដល់ខ្ញុំបាទ ក្នុងឪកាសបុណ្យសព របស់ឪពុកខ្ញុំ ។

      ខ្ញុំបាទ សួមឧទ្ទិស មគ្គផល   ដែលលោក  លោកស្រី   បានចូលរួមចាប់ កុសលដែលក្រុមគ្រួសាររបស់ខ្ញុំ បានរៀបចំពិធីបុណ្យសពរបស់ឪពុកខ្ញុំ។
  សួមកុសលទាំងអស់នោះ សម្រេចដល់បុព្វការីជន របស់លោក លោកស្រី ទៅដល់សុគតិភូមិ ។

 លើសពីនេះទៅទៀត​​ សូមឧទ្ទិស​កុសលទាំងនេះ ​អោយ​​កើតមានដល់​លោកលោកស្រីទាំងឡាយសូមប្រកបតែសេចក្តីសុខសេចក្តីចម្រើននិងទទួល
យកនូវសម្បត្តិបរមសុខ គ្រប់ទិនទិវារាត្រី  ។

Friday, May 4, 2012

ការផាត់ទាត់និងទូទាត់

ប្រភពៈ ផមក
  • តើអ្វីជាការផាត់ទាត់?
    • ការផាត់ទាត់គឺជាលំដាប់នៃដំណើរការដែល Central Counter-party (CCP)ចាត់ចែងធានាលើការទូទាត់ដោយការបន្សុទ្ធ ឬកាត់កង netting ឥណទាន និងបំណុលទាំងឡាយរវាងអ្នកលក់ និងអ្នកទិញ។
      • Central Counter- party (CCP)
      • សំដៅលើអង្គភាពដែលទទួលយក កាតព្វកិច្ចជាអ្នកទិញចំពោះអ្នកលក់ទាំងអស់ និងជាអ្នកលក់ចំពោះអ្នកទិញទាំងអស់។ តាមវិធីនេះ អ្នកទិញ និងអ្នកលក់មិនមានកាតព្វកិច្ចហិរញ្ញវត្ថុចំពោះគ្នាទៅវិញទៅមកទេ ផ្ទុយទៅវិញត្រូវមានកាតព្វកិច្ចហិរញ្ញវត្ថុចំពោះ CCP។
        ក្នុងករណីនេះផ្សារមូលបត្រកម្ពុជា (ផ.ម.ក)មានតួនាទីជា CCPនៅក្នុងផ្សារមូលបត្រកម្ពុជា។
      • ការបន្សុទ្ធ ឬការកាត់កង (Netting):
      • គឺជាដំណើរការនៃការកាត់បន្ថយកាតព្វកិច្ចឥណទាន ឬឥណពន្ធរបស់អ្នកជួញដូរជាច្រើន ពីចំនួនច្រើនទៅចំនួនតិច។ តាមរយៈការបន្សុទ្ធ ផ.ម.ក. គណនាទំហំដែលត្រូវទូទាត់ចុងក្រោយ។ បន្ទាប់ពីការបន្សុទ្ធ កាតព្វកិច្ចឥណទាន ឬឥណពន្ធដើមត្រូវបានជំនួសដោយកាតព្វកិច្ចឥណទាន ឬឥណពន្ធតែមួយ។
        ទំហំដែលត្រូវទូទាត់ចុងក្រោយ ត្រូវបានគណនាតាមរបៀបដូចខាងក្រោម៖
        • ករណីមូលបត្រ៖ ទទួលបានដោយធ្វើការបន្សុទ្ធបរិមាណបានលក់សរុប និងបរិមាណបានទិញសរុប ចំពោះប្រភេទមូលបត្រមួយ និងចំពោះសមាជិកនីមួយៗ។
        • ករណីសាច់ប្រាក់៖ ទទួលបានដោយធ្វើការផាត់ទាត់តម្លៃបានទិញសរុប និងតម្លៃបានលក់សរុបចំពោះសមាជិកនីមួយៗ។
  • តើអ្វីជាការទូទាត់?
    • ការទូទាត់គឺជាការបញ្ចប់ប្រតិបត្តិការ ដែលអ្នកលក់ផ្ទេរមូលបត្រ ឬឧបករណ៍ហិរញ្ញវត្ថុទៅឲ្យអ្នកទិញ ហើយអ្នកទិញផ្ទេរសាច់ប្រាក់ទៅឲ្យអ្នកលក់។
      • លក្ខណៈនៃការទូទាត់របស់ ផ.ម.ក.:
        • វីធីសាស្រ្តនៃការទូទាត់៖ DVP3 (ការប្រគល់មូលបត្រ ថ្នូរនឹងសាច់ប្រាក់គំរូទី៣)
          DVP3 ជាដំណើរការនៃការប្រគល់មូលបត្រ ដែលត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើងក្នុងពេលដំណាលគ្នានៃការប្រគល់សាច់ប្រាក់ ដោយផ្អែកលើមូលដ្ឋានបន្សុទ្ធ (បន្សុទ្ធមូលបត្រ និង បន្សុទ្ធសាច់ប្រាក់) ។វាត្រូវបានកើតឡើងនៅចុងគ្រានៃវដ្តដំណើរការប្រតិបត្តិការ។
        • ពេលវេលានៃការទូទាត់៖ ម៉ោង៨ និង៣០ នាទីព្រឹក (T+2)
          សមាជិកត្រូវផ្ទេរមូលបត្រ និងសាច់ប្រាក់ដែលត្រូវទូទាត់ទៅគណនីរបស់ ផ.ម.ក. នៅមុនម៉ោង ៨:៣០ព្រឹក នៅកាលបរិច្ឆេទទូទាត់ ហើយផ.ម.ក. ត្រូវទូទាត់មូលបត្រ និងសាច់ប្រាក់បន្ដទៅឲ្យសមាជិកដែលត្រូវទទួលការទូទាត់ បន្ទាប់ពីម៉ោង ៨:៣០ព្រឹក នៅថ្ងៃដដែលនៃកាលបរិច្ឆេទទូទាត់។
        • ភ្នាក់ងារទូទាត់សាច់ប្រាក់ (ធនាគារអេស៊ីលីដា ធនាគារកាណាឌីយ៉ា និង ធនាគារ BIDC) មានតួនាទីបំពេញកាតព្វកិច្ចទូទាត់សាច់ប្រាក់។

ការរក្សាទុកមូលបត្រ

ប្រភព៖ ផមក
  • តើការរក្សាទុកមូលបត្រគីជាអ្វី?
    • ប្រតិបត្តិកររក្សាទុកមូលបត្រសំដៅដល់កន្លែងសម្រាប់ដាក់ផ្ញើមូលបត្រ។
      ការដាក់ផ្ញើមូលបត្រគីជាដំណើរការនៃការផ្ទេរកម្មសិទ្ធិករមូលបត្រ តាមរយៈការផ្ទេររវាងគណនី (Book Entry) (ការកត់ត្រាឥណទាន/ឥណពន្ធ ក្នុងសៀវភៅគណនីរបស់សមាជិក និងអ្នកចូលរួម) ដោយគ្មានចរន្ដនៃការផ្ទេរមូលបត្ររូបវ័ន្ដ។
  • អត្ថប្រយោជន៍
    • នៅពេលមូលបត្រមានការជួញដូររវាងវិនិយោគិន ប្រតិបត្តិកររក្សាទុកមូលបត្រធើ្វការទូទាត់នូវប្រតិបត្តិការទាំងនោះតាមរយៈការផ្ទេររវាងគណនី (Book Entry)ដោយគ្មានការផ្ទេរមូលបត្ររូបវ័ន្ត។ ដូច្នេះហានិភ័យចំពោះការបាត់ និងការលួចមូលបត្រត្រូវបានជៀសវាងទាំងស្រុង។
      សមាជិក អ្នកចូលរួម និងអតិថិជន ដែលបានដាក់ផ្ញើមូលបត្រនៅ ផ.ម.ក. មិនចាំបាច់ដកមូលបត្រទៅវិញ នៅពេលដែលត្រូវអនុវត្តសិទ្ធិកម្មសិទ្ធិករឡើយ។
  • ការបើកគណនី
    • បុគ្គលដែលអាចបើកគណនីមូលបត្រនៅប្រតិបត្តិកររក្សាទុកមូលបត្ររួមមាន ក្រុមហ៊ុនមូលបត្រ និងក្រុមហ៊ុនចុះបញ្ជីលក់មូលបត្រ។ បុគ្គលដែលមានបំណងបើកគណនីមូលបត្រត្រូវបំពេញបែបបទបើកគណនីមូលបត្រនៅប្រតិបត្តិកររក្សាទុកមូលបត្រ។ គ្រប់គណនីមូលបត្រទាំងអស់ រួមមានគណនីមូលបត្ររបស់សមាជិក ឬ អតិថិជនត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងក្នុង ប្រព័ន្ធ Ledger (ledger system) របស់ ផ.ម.ក. ដែលផ្ទុកផងដែរនូវទិន្នន័យលម្អិតនៃប្រតិបត្តិការរបស់សមាជិក និងអតិថិជន ព្រមទាំងទិន្នន័យលម្អិតនៃបញ្ជីភាគហ៊ុនិក។
  • ការដាក់ផ្ញើមូលបត្រ
    • ដើម្បីដាក់ផ្ញើមូលបត្រនៅប្រតិបត្តិកររក្សាទុកមូលបត្រ បុគ្គលដែលដាក់ផ្ញើត្រូវផ្ដល់ព័ត៌មានដូចខាងក្រោមដល់ប្រតិបត្តិកររក្សាទុកមូលបត្រ :
      • ប្រភេទមូលបត្រ
      • ចំនួននៃការបោះផ្សាយ
      • ឈ្មោះមូលបត្រ
      • អក្សរកូដ
      • ចំនួនមូលបត្រសរុប
      • កាលបរិចេ្ឆទបោះផ្សាយ
      • កាលបរិចេ្ឆទចុះបញ្ជី
      • ព័ត៌មានផេ្សងទៀតពាក់ព័ន្ធនឹងកម្មសិទ្ធិភាពមូលបត្រ

CSX Index ( 2012/05/03 ទីផ្សារបានបិទ )

ប្រភព៖ ផមក
សន្ទស្សន៍ថ្ងៃម្សិល សន្ទស្សន៍បច្ចុប្បន្ន បម្រែបម្រួល %បម្រែបម្រួល ថ្លៃបើក កម្រិតខ្ពស់ កម្រិតទាប ទំហំជួញដូរ
(ភាគហ៊ុន)
តម្លៃជួញដូរ
(រៀល)
817.20 779.57 37.63 4.60 779.57 779.57 779.57 26,171 189,739,750
កាលបរិច្ឆេទ សន្ទស្សន៍បច្ចុប្បន្ន បម្រែបម្រួល %បម្រែបម្រួល ទំហំជួញដូរ
(ភាគហ៊ុន)
តម្លៃជួញដូរ
(រៀល)
ថ្លៃបើក កម្រិតខ្ពស់ កម្រិតទាប
03/05/2012 779.57 37.63 4.60 26,171 189,739,750 779.57 779.57 779.57
02/05/2012 817.2 43.02 5.00 17,097 129,937,200 817.2 817.2 817.2
30/04/2012 860.22 43.01 4.76 33,629 269,032,000 860.22 860.22 860.22
27/04/2012 903.23 43.01 4.55 34,877 292,966,800 903.23 903.23 903.23
26/04/2012 946.24 48.38 4.86 3,453 30,386,400 946.24 946.24 946.24
25/04/2012 994.62 48.39 4.64 35,453 327,940,250 994.62 994.62 994.62
24/04/2012 1,043.01 53.76 4.90 54,735 530,929,500 1,043.01 1,043.01 1,043.01
23/04/2012 1,096.77 0.00 0.00 542,994 5,553,099,200 1,107.53 1,107.53 1,096.77
20/04/2012 1,096.77 48.38 4.61 377,342 3,848,888,400 1,096.77 1,096.77 1,096.77
19/04/2012 1,048.39 48.39 4.84 488,528 4,763,148,000 1,048.39 1,048.39 1,048.39
Copyright@2011 Cambodia Securities Exchange (CSX). All rights Reserved.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

កម្ពុជា​ត្រៀម​ទាក់ទាញ​ទេសចរ​ពី​តំបន់​អាស៊ាន

កម្ពុជា​ត្រៀម​ទាក់ទាញ​ទេសចរ​ពី​តំបន់​អាស៊ាន

យុវជន និង​សមាហរណកម្ម​អាស៊ាន

យុវជន និង​សមាហរណកម្ម​អាស៊ាន

ភាព​ខុស​គ្នា​រវាង​អំពើ​កុបកម្ម បាតុកម្ម និង​កូដកម្ម​អហិង្សា

ភាព​ខុស​គ្នា​រវាង​អំពើ​កុបកម្ម បាតុកម្ម និង​កូដកម្ម​អហិង្សា

ដំណោះស្រាយ​លើ​វិវាទ​រវាង​ពាណិជ្ជករ​និង​អតិថិជន​ដែល​ជាវ​ភ្លើង​អគ្គិសនី

ដំណោះស្រាយ​លើ​វិវាទ​រវាង​ពាណិជ្ជករ​និង​អតិថិជន​ដែល​ជាវ​ភ្លើង​អគ្គិសនី

សង្ឃឹម​ផល​ថ្មី

សង្ឃឹម​ផល​ថ្មី

ប្រភេទ​នំ​ខ្មែរ

ប្រភេទ​នំ​ខ្មែរ

បង្កើត​គំនិត

បង្កើត​គំនិត

តើ​ឈ្នះ​មែន​ឬ?

តើ​ឈ្នះ​មែន​ឬ?

ទោះ​ជា

ទោះ​ជា

អាន​កើន​ប្រាជ្ញា

អាន​កើន​ប្រាជ្ញា

ការ​បង្ក​សំឡេង​រំខាន​និង​ការ​ផ្ដន្ទាទោស

ការ​បង្ក​សំឡេង​រំខាន​និង​ការ​ផ្ដន្ទាទោស

បញ្ហា​ប្ដី​ប្រពន្ធ​រស់​នៅ​ដោយ​មិន​ចុះ​សំបុត្រ​អាពាហ៍ពិពាហ៍

បញ្ហា​ប្ដី​ប្រពន្ធ​រស់​នៅ​ដោយ​មិន​ចុះ​សំបុត្រ​អាពាហ៍ពិពាហ៍

ការ​បរិហារ​កេរ្តិ៍

ការ​បរិហារ​កេរ្តិ៍

ប្រតិកម្ម​ជំទាស់​ចំពោះ​​គម្រោងសាង​​សង់​ប្រាសាទ​ចំលង​តាម​អង្គរវត្ត​កម្ពុជា

ប្រតិកម្ម​ជំទាស់​ចំពោះ​​គម្រោងសាង​​សង់​ប្រាសាទ​ចំលង​តាម​អង្គរវត្ត​កម្ពុជា

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Arbitration

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a legal technique for the resolution of disputesoutside the courts, where the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal"), by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound. It is a settlement technique in which a third party reviews the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding for both sides.[1] Other forms of ADR include mediation[2] (a form of settlement negotiation facilitated by a neutral third party) and non-binding resolution by experts. Arbitration is often used for the resolution of commercial disputes, particularly in the context of international commercial transactions. The use of arbitration is also frequently employed in consumer and employment matters, where arbitration may be mandated by the terms of employment or commercial contracts.
Arbitration can be either voluntary or mandatory (although mandatory arbitration can only come from a statute or from a contract that is voluntarily entered into, where the parties agree to hold all disputes to arbitration, without knowing, specifically, what disputes will ever occur) and can be either binding or non-binding. Non-binding arbitration is, on the surface, similar to mediation. However, the principal distinction is that whereas a mediator will try to help the parties find a middle ground on which to compromise, the (non-binding) arbitrator remains totally removed from the settlement process and will only give a determination of liability and, if appropriate, an indication of the quantum of damages payable.

Arbitration is a proceeding in which a dispute is resolved by an impartial adjudicator whose decision the parties to the dispute have agreed, or legislation has decreed, will be final and binding. Arbitration is not the same as:

Contents

  [hide

[edit]Advantages and disadvantages

Parties often seek to resolve their disputes through arbitration because of a number of perceived potential advantages over judicial proceedings:
  • when the subject matter of the dispute is highly technical, arbitrators with an appropriate degree of expertise can be appointed (as one cannot "choose the judge" in litigation)
  • arbitration is often faster than litigation in court[citation needed]
  • arbitration can be cheaper and more flexible for businesses[citation needed]
  • arbitral proceedings and an arbitral award are generally non-public, and can be made confidential[5]
  • in arbitral proceedings the language of arbitration may be chosen, whereas in judicial proceedings the official language of the country of the competent court will be automatically applied
  • because of the provisions of the New York Convention 1958, arbitration awards are generally easier to enforce in other nations than court judgments
  • in most legal systems there are very limited avenues for appeal of an arbitral award, which is sometimes an advantage because it limits the duration of the dispute and any associated liability
Some of the disadvantages include:
  • arbitration may become highly complex[citation needed]
  • arbitration may be subject to pressures from powerful law firms representing the stronger and wealthier party[citation needed]
  • arbitration agreements are sometimes contained in ancillary agreements, or in small print in other agreements, and consumers and employees often do not know in advance that they have agreed to mandatory binding pre-dispute arbitration by purchasing a product or taking a job
  • if the arbitration is mandatory and binding, the parties waive their rights to access the courts and to have a judge or jury decide the case
  • in some arbitration agreements, the parties are required to pay for the arbitrators, which adds an additional layer of legal cost that can be prohibitive, especially in small consumer disputes[citation needed]
  • in some arbitration agreements and systems, the recovery of attorneys' fees is unavailable, making it difficult or impossible for consumers or employees to get legal representation[citation needed]; however most arbitration codes and agreements provide for the same relief that could be granted in court
  • if the arbitrator or the arbitration forum depends on the corporation for repeat business, there may be an inherent incentive to rule against the consumer or employee[citation needed]
  • there are very limited avenues for appeal, which means that an erroneous decision cannot be easily overturned
  • although usually thought to be speedier, when there are multiple arbitrators on the panel, juggling their schedules for hearing dates in long cases can lead to delays
  • in some legal systems, arbitrary awards have fewer enforcement options than judgments; although in the United States arbitration awards are enforced in the same manner as court judgments and have the same effect
  • arbitrators are generally unable to enforce interlocutory measures against a party, making it easier for a party to take steps to avoid enforcement of member or a small group of members in arbitration due to increasing legal fees, without explaining to the members the adverse consequences of an unfavorable ruling
  • rule of applicable law is not necessarily binding on the arbitrators, although they cannot disregard the law[citation needed]
  • discovery may be more limited in arbitration or entirely nonexistent
  • the potential to generate billings by attorneys may be less than pursuing the dispute through trial
  • unlike court judgments, arbitration awards themselves are not directly enforceable. A party seeking to enforce an arbitration award must resort to judicial remedies, called an action to "confirm" an award
  • although grounds for attacking an arbitration award in court are limited, efforts to confirm the award can be fiercely fought[citation needed], thus necessitating huge legal expenses that negate the perceived economic incentive to arbitrate the dispute in the first place.

[edit]Arbitrability

By their nature, the subject matter of some disputes is not capable of arbitration. In general, two groups of legal procedures cannot be subjected to arbitration:
  • Procedures which necessarily lead to a determination which the parties to the dispute may not enter into an agreement upon:[6] Some court procedures lead to judgments which bind all members of the general public, or public authorities in their capacity as such, or third parties, or which are being conducted in the public interest. For example, until the 1980s, antitrust matters were not arbitrable in the United States.[7] Matters relating to crimesstatus and family law are generally not considered to be arbitrable, as the power of the parties to enter into an agreement upon these matters is at least restricted. However, most other disputes that involve private rights between two parties can be resolved using arbitration. In some disputes, parts of claims may be arbitrable and other parts not. For example, in a dispute over patent infringement, a determination of whether a patent has been infringed could be adjudicated upon by an arbitration tribunal, but the validity of a patent could not: As patents are subject to a system of public registration, an arbitral panel would have no power to order the relevant body to rectify any patent registration based upon its determination.
  • Some legal orders exclude or restrict the possibility of arbitration for reasons of the protection of weaker members of the public, e.g. consumers. Examples: German law excludes disputes over the rental of living space from any form of arbitration[8], while arbitration agreements with consumers are only considered valid if they are signed by either party,[9] and if the signed document does not bear any other content than the arbitration agreement.[10]

[edit]Arbitration agreement

See also: Arbitration clause
In theory, arbitration is a consensual process; a party cannot be forced to arbitrate a dispute unless he agrees to do so. In practice, however, many fine-print arbitration agreements are inserted in situations in which consumers and employees have no bargaining power. Moreover, arbitration clauses are frequently placed within sealed users' manuals within products, within lengthy click-through agreements on websites, and in other contexts in which meaningful consent is not realistic. Such agreements are generally divided into two types:
  • agreements which provide that, if a dispute should arise, it will be resolved by arbitration. These will generally be normal contracts, but they contain anarbitration clause
  • agreements which are signed after a dispute has arisen, agreeing that the dispute should be resolved by arbitration (sometimes called a "submission agreement")
The former is the far more prevalent type of arbitration agreement. Sometimes, legal significance attaches to the type of arbitration agreement. For example, in certain Commonwealth countries, it is possible to provide that each party should bear their own costs in a conventional arbitration clause, but not in a submission agreement.
In keeping with the informality of the arbitration process, the law is generally keen to uphold the validity of arbitration clauses even when they lack the normal formal language associated with legal contracts. Clauses which have been upheld include:
  • "arbitration in London - English law to apply"[11]
  • "suitable arbitration clause"[12]
  • "arbitration, if any, by ICC Rules in London"[13]
The courts have also upheld clauses which specify resolution of disputes other than in accordance with a specific legal system. These include provision indicating:
  • that the arbitrators "must not necessarily judge according to the strict law but as a general rule ought chiefly to consider the principles of practical business"[14]
  • "internationally accepted principles of law governing contractual relations"[15]
Agreements to refer disputes to arbitration generally have a special status in the eyes of the law. For example, in disputes on a contract, a common defence is to plead the contract is void and thus any claim based upon it fails. It follows that if a party successfully claims that a contract is void, then each clause contained within the contract, including the arbitration clause, would be void. However, in most countries, the courts have accepted that:
  1. a contract can only be declared void by a court or other tribunal; and
  2. if the contract (valid or otherwise) contains an arbitration clause, then the proper forum to determine whether the contract is void or not, is the arbitration tribunal.[16]
Arguably, either position is potentially unfair; if a person is made to sign a contract under duress, and the contract contains an arbitration clause highly favourable to the other party, the dispute may still referred to that arbitration tribunal.[citation needed] Conversely a court may be persuaded that the arbitration agreement itself is void having been signed under duress. However, most courts will be reluctant to interfere with the general rule which does allow for commercial expediency; any other solution (where one first had to go to court to decide whether one had to go to arbitration) would be self defeating.

[edit]Sources of law

States regulate arbitration through a variety of laws. The main body of law applicable to arbitration is normally contained either in the national Private International Law Act (as is the case in Switzerland) or in a separate law on arbitration (as is the case in England). In addition to this, a number of national procedural laws may also contain provisions relating to arbitration.
By far the most important international instrument on arbitration law is the 1958 New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Some other relevant international instruments are:
  • The Geneva Protocol of 1923
  • The Geneva Convention of 1927
  • The European Convention of 1961
  • The Washington Convention of 1965 (governing settlement of international investment disputes)
  • The UNCITRAL Model Law (providing a model for a national law of arbitration)
  • The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (providing a set of rules for an ad hoc arbitration)

[edit]Arbitral tribunal

The term arbitral tribunal is used to denote the arbitrator or arbitrators sitting to determine the dispute. The composition of the arbitral tribunal can vary enormously, with either a sole arbitrator sitting, two or more arbitrators, with or without a chairman or umpire, and various other combinations.
In most jurisdictions, an arbitrator enjoys immunity from liability for anything done or omitted whilst acting as arbitrator unless the arbitrator acts in bad faith.
Arbitrations are usually divided into two types:
  • ad hoc arbitrations and administered arbitrations.
In ad hoc arbitrations, the arbitral tribunals are appointed by the parties or by an appointing authority chosen by the parties. After the tribunal has been formed, the appointing authority will normally have no other role and the arbitation will be managed by the tribunal.
In administered arbitration, the arbitration will be administered by a professional arbitration institution providing arbitration services, such as the LCIA in London, or the ICC in Paris, or the American Arbitration Association in the United States. Normally the arbitration institution also will be the appointing authority.
Arbitration institutions tend to have their own rules and procedures, and may be more formal. They also tend to be more expensive, and, for procedural reasons, slower.[17]

[edit]Duties of the tribunal

The duties of a tribunal will be determined by a combination of the provisions of the arbitration agreement and by the procedural laws which apply in the seat of the arbitration. The extent to which the laws of the seat of the arbitration permit "party autonomy" (the ability of the parties to set out their own procedures and regulations) determines the interplay between the two.
However, in almost all countries the tribunal owes several non-derogable duties. These will normally be:
  • to act fairly and impartially between the parties, and to allow each party a reasonable opportunity to put their case and to deal with the case of their opponent (sometimes shortened to: complying with the rules of "natural justice"); and
  • to adopt procedures suitable to the circumstances of the particular case, so as to provide a fair means for resolution of the dispute.[18]

[edit]Arbitral awards

Although arbitration awards are characteristically an award of damages against a party, in many jurisdictions tribunals have a range of remedies that can form a part of the award. These may include:
  1. payment of a sum of money (conventional damages)
  2. the making of a "declaration" as to any matter to be determined in the proceedings
  3. in some[who?] jurisdictions, the tribunal may have the same power as a court to:
    1. order a party to do or refrain from doing something ("injunctive relief")
    2. to order specific performance of a contract
    3. to order the rectification, setting aside or cancellation of a deed or other document.
  4. In other jurisdictions, however, unless the parties have expressly granted the arbitrators the right to decide such matters, the tribunal's powers may be limited to deciding whether a party is entitled to damages. It may not have the legal authority to order injunctive relief, issue a declaration, or rectify a contract, such powers being reserved to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts.

[edit]Enforcement of arbitration awards

One of the reasons that arbitration is so popular in international trade as a means of dispute resolution, is that it is often easier to enforce an arbitration award in a foreign country than it is to enforce a judgment of the court.
Under the New York Convention 1958, an award issued a contracting state can generally be freely enforced in any other contracting state, only subject to certain, limited defenses.
Only foreign arbitration awards can be subject to recognition and enforcement pursuant to the New York Convention. An arbitral decision is foreign where the award was made in a state other than the state of recognition or where foreign procedural law was used.[19]
Virtually every significant commercial country in the world is a party to the Convention, but relatively few countries have a comprehensive network for cross-border enforcement of judgments of the court.
The other characteristic of cross-border enforcement of arbitration awards that makes them appealing to commercial parties is that they are not limited to awards of damages. Whereas in most countries only monetary judgments are enforceable in the cross-border context, no such restrictions are imposed on arbitration awards and so it is theoretically possible (although unusual in practice) to obtain an injunction or an order for specific performance in an arbitration proceeding which could then be enforced in another New York Convention contracting state.
The New York Convention is not actually the only treaty dealing with cross-border enforcement of arbitration awards. The earlier Geneva Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1927 [1] remains in force, but the success of the New York Convention means that the Geneva Convention is rarely utilized in practice.
Article V of the New York Convention provides an exhaustive list of grounds on which enforcement can be challenged. These are generally narrowly construed by the courts in arbitration centres to uphold the pro-enforcement bias of the Convention.

[edit]Arbitration with sovereign governments

Certain international conventions exist in relation to the enforcement of awards against states.
  • The Washington Convention 1965 relates to settlement of investment disputes between states and citizens of other countries. The Convention created theInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (or ICSID). Compared to other arbitration institutions, relatively few awards have been rendered under ICSID.[20]
  • The Algiers Declaration of 1981 established the Iran-US Claims Tribunal to adjudicate claims of American corporations and individuals in relation to expropriated property during the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979. The tribunal has not been a notable success, and has even been held by an English court to be void under its own governing law.[21]

[edit]Challenge

Generally speaking, by their nature, arbitration proceedings tend not to be subject to appeal, in the ordinary sense of the word.
However, in most countries, the court maintains a supervisory role to set aside awards in extreme cases, such as fraud or in the case of some serious legal irregularity on the part of the tribunal.
Only domestic arbitral awards[citation needed] (i.e. those where the seat of arbitration is located in the same state as the court seised) are subject to set aside procedure.
In American arbitration law there exists a small but significant body of case law which deals with the power of the courts to intervene where the decision of an arbitrator is in fundamental disaccord with the applicable principles of law or the contract.[22]
Unfortunately there is little agreement amongst the different American judgments and textbooks as to whether such a separate doctrine exists at all, or the circumstances in which it would apply. There does not appear to be any recorded judicial decision in which it has been applied. However, conceptually, to the extent it exists, the doctrine would be an important derogation from the general principle that awards are not subject to review by the courts.

[edit]Costs

In many legal systems - both common law and civil law - it is normal practice for the courts to award legal costs against a losing party, with the winner becoming entitled to recover an approximation of what it spent in pursuing its claim (or in defense of a claim). The United States is a notable exception to this rule, as except for certain extreme cases, a prevailing party in a US legal proceeding does not become entitled to recoup its legal fees from the losing party.
Like the courts, arbitral tribunals generally have the same power to award costs in relation to the determination of the dispute. In international arbitration as well as domestic arbitrations governed by the laws of countries in which courts may award costs against a losing party, the arbitral tribunal will also determine the portion of the arbitrators' fees that the losing party is required to bear.

[edit]Nomenclature

As methods of dispute resolution, arbitration procedure can be varied to suit the needs of the parties. Certain specific "types" of arbitration procedure have developed, particularly in North America.
  • Judicial Arbitration is, usually, not arbitration at all, but merely a court process which refers to itself as arbitration, such as small claims arbitration before the County Courts in the United Kingdom.[3]
  • High-Low Arbitration, or Bracketed Arbitration, is an arbitration wherein the parties to the dispute agree in advance the limits within which the arbitral tribunal must render its award. It is only generally useful where liability is not in dispute, and the only issue between the party is the amount of compensation. If the award is lower than the agreed minimum, then the defendant only need pay the lower limit; if the award is higher than the agreed maximum, the claimant will receive the upper limit. If the award falls within the agreed range, then the parties are bound by the actual award amount. Practice varies as to whether the figures may or may not be revealed to the tribunal, or whether the tribunal is even advised of the parties' agreement.
  • Binding Arbitration is a form of arbitration where the decision by the arbitrator is legally binding and enforceable, similar to a court order.
  • Non-Binding Arbitration is a process which is conducted as if it were a conventional arbitration, except that the award issued by the tribunal is not binding on the parties, and they retain their rights to bring a claim before the courts or other arbitration tribunal; the award is in the form of an independent assessment of the merits of the case, designated to facilitate an out-of-court settlement. State law may automatically make a non-binding arbitration binding, if, for example, the non-binding arbitration is court-ordered, and no party requests a trial de novo (as if the arbitration had not been held).[23]
  • Pendulum Arbitration refers to a determination in industrial disputes where an arbitrator has to resolve a claim between a trade union and management by making a determination of which of the two sides has the more reasonable position. The arbitrator must choose only between the two options, and cannot split the difference or select an alternative position. It was initiated in Chile in 1979.
  • Night Baseball Arbitration is a variation of baseball arbitration where the figures are not revealed to the arbitration tribunal. The arbitrator will determinate the quantum of the claim in the usual way, and the parties agree to accept and be bound by the figure which is closest to the tribunal's award.
Such forms of "Last Offer Arbitration" can also be combined with mediation to create MEDALOA hybrid processes (Mediation followed by Last Offer Arbitration).[24]

[edit]See also

[edit]Notes

ម៉ោងលើពិភពលោក